-->
Whatever I FancyWhatever I Fancy BlogWhatever I Fancy

incorporating
Climate Blog Climate Blog UK Climate Blog

and remembering
Coronavirus Blog Coronavirus Blog UK Coronavirus Blog
Comment | Opinion | Questions

Go to Charlie Lewis website collection home page

Stand by Ukraine! Ceasefire for Gaza!

[Entries are in reverse date order, latest at the top. Comm­ents and cont­ri­but­ions are wel­come to the em­ail add­ress at the bot­tom.]


Wednesday 21st May

Click to see a high resolution map of the Basque Country

Son Ben is today returning from Bilbao (which he tells me is awash with drun­ken Man­chest­er Un­ited and Tott­en­ham supp­or­ters in town for foot­ball's even­ing Eur­opa League cup final in the Ath­let­ic Club San Mamés Stad­ium), so I'm giv­ing a nod to the Basque Coun­try. If you click on the map above, you will load a high res­ol­ut­ion vers­ion.

He has also just sat his first Basque language exam. To give you a flavour of its difference, I'm going to post below the text Ben sent to me, namely his pre-prepared presentation for the oral part of the exam. If you're like me, you probably learnt French at school and might expect to deduce a gloss of meaning from some southern European prose. I also studied Latin and Spanish, and am reasonably fluent in Italian. But Basque? Have a go at Ben's piece below. What can you extract?

Ni Ben naiz eta gaur nekatuta nago bart gauean nik ez dut ondo lorik egin-eta.


Ingelesa naiz, Bristolekoa, baina 2018tik Euskal Herrian bizi naiz. 37 urte ditut eta Fanon bizi naiz. Erandioko auzo bat da. Etxea baserria da eta bi lagunekin bizi naiz. Hiru katu eta txakur bat dauzkagu.


Sukaldaria naiz baina orain ez nago lanean. Uztailan yateetan lan egin nahi dut orduan Mallorcara joango naiz. Han horretaz lan asko dago.


Etxean, sukaldatzea gustatzen zait. Gazta eta ogia egiten dut. Liburusalea naiz eta musika jotzea gustatzen zait. Guitarra eta banjoa joten dut. Nire neskalagunarekin autokarabana daukagu eta bidaiatzea gustatzen zagu.

Mental. Its origins are hazy. As I've hinted, definitely not Romance. Most scholars believe it to be the last remaining descendant of one of the pre-Indo-European languages of prehistoric Europe that appeared during the 3rd millenium BC. Very old. Then it gets even more complicated. Besides its standardised version, the five historic Basque dialects are Biscayan, Gipuzkoan, and Upper Navarrese in Spain and Navarrese-Lapurdian and Souletin in France.

If you really want to understand what Ben wrote, you know what to do. Basque is supported in Google Translate.

Oh, and another thing ... the Torygraph thinks this is BAD news ?!?


Tuesday 20th May

Our long-serving Trinity Ward councillor, Stroud Mayor and Green Party pioneer John Marjoram died on Saturday. In present times, when the world is challenged by any number of grim forces, where community is threatened by greed, we will miss him. Passionate and fearless, John stood up against everything and for everybody.









Councillor Sue Fenton has written this appraisal on the Green Party website. It's lengthy, but I make no apologies for posting it all. John deserves a full send-off, a record of his commitment.

Lifelong pacifist and nature lover, conscientious objector and former Communist, protest veteran, ten-times Mayor and the UK's longest continuously serving Green councillor, John Marjoram died on May 17 at the age of 86, after a long illness. This article looks at his work and achievements.


Growing up in rural Essex in the 1940s gave John Marjoram an enduring love of nature, while dinner-table debates with his staunch Labour father and Conservative-voting mother gave him an early interest in politics.


Other formative influences were two uncles, one a conscientious objector during World War 1, and the other who did take part in the fighting but talked to John about the horrors he'd seen. Young John vowed that he would never use a weapon or kill anyone. He retained anti-war and pacifist beliefs throughout his life.


These childhood influences were a natural precursor to his subsequent involvement in Green politics - John was to become one of the first Greens in the country to be elected to office and holds a record as the longest continuously serving Green councillor.


Born in 1939, an only child, John left school at 15 and worked in factories, offices, farms and building sites. He was briefly a member of the Communist Party and was sacked from a factory job for trying to start a trade union.


In 1959 he was called up for national service but declared himself a conscientious objector. "Christ said 'thou shalt not kill'; it was that simple," said John, a practising Quaker, many years later. While the rest of his intake went to Malaysia to fight the Communists, he remained in England working in an administrative role.


About that time, he got involved with the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and the Peace Pledge Union, and took part in the second Aldermaston March during leave from national service in 1961.


He was twice arrested and jailed for using a plough to break into American military bases. He subsequently attended numerous anti-war rallies and organised hundreds of coaches to go to national protests. After the invasion of Iraq in 2003, John was involved in numerous local actions and vigils.


In 1968 John moved to Stroud with his young family, drawn here by his affiliation with the Quakers, who had a strong presence in the town.


He helped to set up the Home Farm Trust in 1970, turning 10 acres of agricultural land into a space for local residents to learn gardening and farming skills. He saw this work as a way of balancing his political work with practical caring for the land, animals and people.


In 1972 John went back to college to study for a diploma in youth and social work, going on to run a youth club in Stonehouse.


In 1975 he co-founded a local branch of the People Party (later to become the Ecology Party and then the Green Party). He was inspired after reading the Club of Rome's report "Limits to Growth", which explained how fast the finite resources of the planet were being consumed.


During the mid-1970s, John was a founding member of the successful Stroud Campaign Against the Ringroad (SCAR), and as a member of Stroud District Council planning committee prevented many unsightly developments from happening locally. He was pivotal in preventing the Hill Paul building being demolished, saving Uplands Post Office and enabling the Town Council's purchase of Lansdown Hall.


1985 saw the creation of Stroud Green Party and John was among the six people who turned up to the first meeting. Not long after that, the subject of the 1986 local elections came up and, as John later recalled: "All eyes turned to me."


John was the obvious choice to be the Green candidate, as he had been a school governor for several years and had been involved in local campaigns. His campaign was boosted by growing public concern about the environment following the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986.


John won the Trinity ward seat on the District Council, becoming the first Green Party councillor to be elected in the UK. He later remembered his young daughter rushing across the room with tears in her eyes and flinging her arms around him shouting 'Dad, you've won!'


John was assigned to sit on the planning committee because of his interest in architecture, and he served on it as a member or deputy chair for 31 years. He recently recalled mammoth committee meetings lasting up to 12 hours, during which councillors would deal with every planning application themselves. He was saddened by the fact that most decision-making over planning applications had since shifted to officers.


John was one of the first councillors elected to Stroud Town Council when it was formed in 1990. John had lobbied for the creation of a town council so that local people would have more say in hyper-local issues.


John served as mayor for 10 civic years, and deputy mayor for seven. He was the UK's first Green Party mayor. He introduced the concept of the 'Mayor's Bench', a particular bench in the town centre where he would sit every Friday so that residents could come and talk to him. He recommended the open-air surgery concept to other councillors, joking: "If you invite people to your house you never get them out again!"


In 1993 he co-founded the Association of Green Councillors, which now has hundreds of members.


In 2012, while Mayor, John was prosecuted for refusing to fill in his census form because of his beliefs as aQuaker. He said he "couldn't live with myself" if he "collaborated" with a military corporation (the census was run by Lockheed Martin UK). He pleaded not guilty and the Crown Prosecution Service dropped the case. At the time John said: "I am disappointed not to have been given the opportunity to give evidence in my defence and to ask some pertinent questions about why the case was brought against me in the first place."


In 2018, committed Remainer John seconded a Green/Labour motion at Stroud District Council calling for a People's Vote on the final terms of any Brexit deal. He pointed out that 55% of Stroud District voted to remain in the EU and that Brexit would have a profound effect on the health and wellbeing of local residents and therefore had significant implications for the work of Stroud District Council.


In 2020, John supported the Black Lives Matter movement and was concerned that Covid-19 disproportionately affected Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic people. John was among the local Green councillors who demanded an independent public inquiry into this. They said Covid-19 treatments and vaccines should be made available without profit to poor countries, rather than boosting the profits of the big pharmaceutical companies. John said at the time: "We can't go back [after Covid] to the "business as usual" that created such huge safety and health inequalities in our society."


In 2023, John received the title of Stroud's first Honorary Freeman in recognition of his services to the community. He stepped down from politics in 2021, having been a district councillor for Trinity ward in Stroud since 1986 and Mayor 10 times.


John's beliefs


Electoral reform: He was a long-time campaigner for Proportional Representation, a voting system that would lead to fairer distribution of parliamentary seats than the First Past the Post system. He was an active supporter of the Make Votes Matter campaign.


War and peace: John maintained that 'defence' should never mean attacking other countries, citing recent military action in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya and Syria as immoral and the First World War as an Imperial power struggle to get control of oil from the Middle East.


"We never seem to remember the implications of war. We repeat our pattern time after time. Lacking the capacity to move on we invent ever more lethal weapons, nearing ourselves to world annihilation with nuclear weapons.


"It is naïve to believe you can defeat terrorism by bombing: all you do in these situations is create further misery, hatefulness and a desire for revenge. Exactly what terrorist organisations breed on."


John believed it was "repulsive" that the UK funded wars rather than helping homeless people, many of whom were ex-soldiers.


John distributed white poppies on behalf of the Peace Pledge Union every November and during his terms as Mayor he refused to take part in the mayoral tradition of laying red poppy wreaths on the war memorial on Remembrance Sunday, opting for white poppies instead.


Nuclear weapons: John considered these weapons to be "abominable" and that the money spent on them should be used instead to benefit society. He was cynical about the huge cost of keeping weapons of mass destruction controlled by the US while so many people were living in poverty, with mental health services on a knife edge, and while cuts to council funding meant councils couldn't build social housing.


A passionate supporter of CND, John was among those involved in the production of a seven-mile-long knitted pink scarf. This was used to connect two nuclear bomb factories in Berkshire and then to wrap around Parliament and the MOD in London, to draw attention to the decision to replace Trident.


Racism: John was a supporter of the Black Lives Matter movement but said the movement was "nothing more than words" without an end to the systemic, institutionalised racism that affects people of colour. "No-one in our community should be discriminated against in any way," he said at the time.


Environment: John never had a driving licence, believing that the fewer cars there are on the road the better for the planet. He walked or cycled everywhere, and never flew on an aeroplane until he was 50 and had to go to Germany to represent Stroud District in a long-standing twinning arrangement.


He was a trustee of Stroud Valleys Project until 1996, and he was a long-term volunteer with SVP's allotment group.


Climate change: In 2014 the SNJ published a letter from John, pointing out that UKIP was the only local party that hadn't committed to taking more action on climate change. "Regrettably it is indicative of many far right wing parties right across the world, who are climate change deniers. This is in the face of actual destruction and erratic weather patterns now happening everywhere at an alarming rate."


He pointed out that by ignoring climate change the far right would have to face up to millions of environmental immigrants coming here as their own lands would no longer be able to produce food.


Brexit: A vocal Remainer, John was active in the campaign to demand a second public referendum about Brexit. John later said that residents of Stroud's German twinning partner, Gottingen, were "distraught" at the outcome of the referendum. "They simply couldn't understand why we'd done it - and neither could I."


Technology: John was well known within the local Party for his antipathy to modern technology, believing it was "ruining civilisation" and insisting during his time as a councillor on receiving agenda papers in paper form. He once replied to a request from the party press officer asking for him to email a photo by saying "I can't tell you how I hate computers; my wife says I am a Luddite!"


He was opposed to the rollout of 5G technology, criticising the speed and lack of consultation. "In a democratic world, communities should have the freedom to opt out of such a big technological transformation, rather than having it imposed on them. Technology should benefit society, and there is no evidence whatsoever that 5G does benefit society, though it will certainly benefit telecommunications companies."


Covid: John courted controversy through his opposition to the Covid vaccination programme and his participation in anti-lockdown demos. "In taking advantage of the pandemic to erode our freedoms, Governments don't have the interests of the people at heart," he said. "Governments and their cronies and big corporations are the ones benefiting. They have to be resisted."


John's achievements


He wasa founding member of the successful Stroud Campaign Against the Ringroad (aka SCAR 1974-1978), as a member of the SDC planning committee preventing many unsightly developments happening locally.


He was pivotal in preventing one of Stroud's most iconic landmarks, a former cloth factory called Hill Paul, from demolition. The town's tallest building, it was due to be demolished in 2001. The wrecking balls were already on site to start work in the morning when John - who was Mayor at the time - phoned the owner at 1am, begging for a reprieve. The owner agreed to meet him at 10am, and by then there were protestors on the roof of the building, stopping the demolition from proceeding. Hill Paul was eventually saved by members of the public, including some of the protesters, buying shares to fund the building's conversion to a residential block.


Another iconic building saved from demolition thanks to John was Woodchester Mansion, then an unfinished and crumbling Victorian mansion near Stroud. John won by just two votes a motion calling on the then Tory-run council to purchase the building so that it could be refurbished, transferred to a trust and opened to the public.


Also high on his list of achievements was halting county council plans to route an A-road through the town centre. A march from Stroud to Gloucester to protest outside Shire Hall generated a lot of publicity and ultimately the road was diverted and now runs around the outskirts of the town centre.


John was also involved with the successful campaign to keep Uplands post office open, and the high-profile Save our Trees demo to stop trees from being cut down to facilitate a road-widening scheme and make way for a new Tesco store.


He helped to buy Lansdown Hall for the community and to rescue Stroud maternity hospital, which was facing closure for lack of government funding.


Asked a couple of years ago if he was proud of his achievements, John said: "Pleased is a better word; I'm not the sort of person to bang a drum and say 'look what I've done!'; none of these successes were down to me alone."


Indeed, he failed to stop the building of the brutalistic-style police station in Stroud. "It's a hideous eyesore; I don't know what the architect was thinking of," he said. "I do wish we could have stopped it."


John always wanted to see Stroud continue to live up to its progressive past with new and different ideas in town planning and ways of living. So he was proud of Stroud's nickname of 'the People's Republic'. "I know the phrase was coined as a joke, but there's an element of truth in it," he said.


His Green colleagues say it was his passion and determination that directly led to the influence the local party now has. There are now more than 400 paid-up members; Greens are part of the ruling alliance on SDC with 23 councillors; they have also been the majority on Stroud Town Council for many years.


What people say about John


"It was John who persuaded me to stand as a paper candidate, before I was eventually elected to SDC. He was such an influential and inspirational activist, not just to us here in Stroud District but across the whole Green movement. He will be much missed." - Cllr Catherine Braun, Leader of Stroud District Council


"John had a way of persuading people to do things; he's the reason my husband and I joined the Green Party, and he recruited me to work for the Green Group (back when there were just six Green councillors). He was a great man and we will miss him." - Lynn Haanen, former coordinator, Stroud District Green Party


"John was inspirational to so many of us in Stroud in the Greens, the peace movement and so many other causes. John was instrumental in getting me to join the Green Party and then to becoming a councillor and then parliamentary candidate. A friend, confidant and inspirational leader. We will miss him." - Martin Whiteside, former leader of the SDC Green group of councillors


"John's first election leaflet for Stroud District Council in the 1980s inspired me. I read it, phoned him, and within half an hour he was on my doorstep talking me into joining the Green Party and standing for election to work alongside him." - Cllr Martin Baxendale, district councillor for Slade ward


"John was an amazing man who inspired so many people into the Green Party and peace movement. A real maverick, they certainly don't make them like John anymore! He was so passionate about politics but also cared deeply for all people and the planet. Stroud will be a lot quieter without him but he has certainly left a great legacy and it is for all of us to continue his work. RIP Mr Stroud!" - Cllr Jonathan Edmunds, district councillor for Randwick, Whitehill and Ruscombe


"John was really supportive when I first stood for election in 2010 and was always there for advice and guidance. Such verve and passionate commitment is rare." - Cllr Richard Dean, county councillor for Dursley


"I was John Marjoram's lodger for a while and I liked the green way that he lived, such as cycling to work and cooking organic vegetables that he'd grown. I recall him gently rebuking me for wastefully keeping the tap running. We Greens owe John so much." - Barbara Imrie, Stroud District Green Party coordinating committee chair

Click to enlarge

Sunday 18th May

London rally yesterday, photos sent home by our local vigil members.

Click to enlarge


Click to enlarge

Tuesday 6th May

I was awoken this morning by a WhatsApp beep on my 'phone. My friend Carletto Beltrame had sent me a message of remembrance from his village of Talmassons in the region of Friuli, north-east Italy. 49 years ago today I was there when the earthquake struck. Here's the headline from the local Messagero Veneto newspaper:

Click to enlarge

Some years ago I wrote an account of the day's events and subsequent impact in a memoir of 1970s Friuli. You can read it here: Read my account of the 1976 earthquake in Friuli.

Monday 5th May

It's hard to stomach this triumphal grin:



Even more annoying is that Farage has, apart from the mom­ents above, been quite thrott­led back in int­er­views since vict­ory. Not act­ually grac­ious to his opp­on­ents - he talked of the Tory ex­per­ience as an "ap­oc­al­ypse" - but reas­on­ably rest­rained, with a hint of self-dep­rec­at­ion, and an ack­now­ledge­ment of the pract­ical chall­enges of act­ually hav­ing to ad­min­ister coun­cils rather than just rant. I suppose you could also call it smug.

I've decided that there's a phrase you have to insert before saying anything good about Farage - "whatever you think about him ...". My first usage would be before declaring that he's a better communicator than the rest. Apart from anything else, he sounds more interesting, more expressive. Labour's inability to tell a story is compounded by the flat tones of their delivery, Starmer and Reeves both, north and south London drones. Farage conveys a sense of excitement, with intonation.

Starmer says, "We get it". I really don't think he does. Tone-deaf, not only in voice but more importantly in judgement too. He talks of pressing ahead harder and faster with "change", when he really needs to consider the directions he takes. Word on the "doorstep" confirmed what we knew, that kicking off with the removal of the winter fuel payment was a dreadful error.

A huge risk for Starmer's Labour is to attempt to out-Reform Farage, to match his ideologies, because "that's what people want". Can you out-populist a populist? As we watch the march of populism across the globe, it's comforting and salutary to witness the success of Canada's Carney and Australia's Albanese, both assisted by Trump-denial. Stand up to a bully, they say.

Sunday 4th May

These have been a bad few days, of which we've had several in the last decade, certainly ever since the fateful 2016 referendum. Bad mornings on which to wake up.

(Click to enlarge any chart below.)


Click to enlarge


Click to enlarge

The link to the Brexit vote is devastatingly apparent. Sir John Curtice, Professor of politics at the University of Strathclyde and prominent BBC election pundit, writes:


"Reflecting the party's anti-EU stance, Reform did much better in wards that voted heavily for Leave in the 2016 EU referendum than it did in wards that backed Remain.


"In wards where more than 65% voted Leave in 2016, Reform won on average as much as 45% of the vote. In contrast, in places where a majority backed Remain, only 19% voted for Reform."

The only less-than-grim news was the diminished success of Reform, the collapse of the controlling Tories (-24, down to 6) and the gains of others in our local Gloucestershire results. Here the LibDems - Remainers all, of course - mini-surged (up 11 to 27), the Greens won some more seats (up 5 to 9).

Click to enlarge

As ever, I'm appalled that so many of my compatriots think this way. How will a migrant or asylum seeker feel when they've digested the news? I await the reactions and comments of participants, both refugee and volunteer, at tomorrow's meeting of Cheltenham Welcomes Refugees. Presumably camping is on the agenda after the victory promise from new Lincolnshire mayor Andrea Jenkyns: "If tents are good enough for illegal migrants in France, they should be here too. No more hotels!"

Tuesday 22th April



In this picture there's a bloke in a yellow vest, black shorts, red-striped socks, next to a water bottle - just above and left of centre - who's looking a bit grumpy. He could be me - not all the time, but now and again. I'll explain.

I've recently strung together a few visits to the gym. I'm not convinced it's doing me any good, but I'm going to give it a few months. It can't harm me to move a bit more. I enjoy the podcasts.

It's been relatively quiet this last week and I've not had any difficulty getting to the equipment I need. Half-term. On regular school days, if I arrive after 3 pm, the place is packed; it really does look like the scene in the picture. Boys and girls, mostly in their mid-teens, sometimes even younger. Grouped round machines, chatting, on their mobile phones, taking turns, but often not doing much - just hanging out. Infuriating when you can't get at the device you want. As I'm retired, I could go in the morning, but I don't feel ready for exercise at that time.

So, for the second time in two weeks, I'm gratified to discover a Guardian newspaper article that reflects and confirms a phemonenon I've seen with my own eyes:



Skinny boys and fit girls. I'm not sure why the latter are there, as they look in very good shape. The boys must be trying to bulk up, I presume so that they have a better chance of attracting the girls. The headline sub-text hints at the secondary motive:



David Minton, the founder of Leisure Database, a specialist fitness market analysis firm, says:


"Gen Z are also going to the gym in order to meet a romantic partner and to increase their network of friends because, while they spend a lot of time on social media, the gym offers an in-person experience rather than a virtual experience. For them, gym-going is all about the social element. It's not about losing weight, because most of them don't need to."

At my gym in Stroud's Stratford Park Leisure Centre, the boys and girls most­ly don't mix. But there's an occ­as­ion­al pair who have made the break­through and ex­er­cise to­geth­er. I wit­nessed a couple yest­er­day who only just man­aged, in the in­ter­est of gym dec­or­um, to keep their hands off each other.

Here's the Guardian article: The Guardian: GenZ and the gym

Monday 21st April

Private Eye cover: click to enlarge

Saturday 19th April

Another age-related post.



I was pleased to see this headline in The Guardian last Monday:



We all hear the warnings about heavy use of com­put­ers and smart­phones, of being glued to a screen. We def­in­ite­ly know the dan­gers of soc­ial media - Ad­ol­esc­ence, right? - and ob­sess­ive doom­scroll­ing. But that's for the young. We've dis­cussed with our daugh­ter Ellie the con­cerns and risks for 10-year-old grand­son Marlie.

I've been involved professionally with computers for over 40 years and my ex­per­ience has been the opp­os­ite. I've never played com­put­er games - well, not since Pac-Man, and I may have dabb­led with Sol­it­aire with the app­ear­ance of Win­dows 3.0 in 1990. The per­son­al com­puter, which I dis­cov­ered along with many others in the early eight­ies, has always been a tool to me, not a play­thing. The word­pro­cess­or trans­formed my life. When I wrote ess­ays at school, I often be­came dis­sat­is­fied with my eff­orts after many pain­ful hours and pages and had to start again, hand-written. The ab­il­ity to save and edit was a bless­ed rel­ease. I talked of this yest­er­day with my friend Ger­ald­ine, and learnt that she felt the same when she came across a Mac for the first time, found the creat­iv­ity it rel­eased.

Dr Michael Scullin, cognitive neuroscientist at Baylor University in Texas, an­al­ysed 57 pub­lished stud­ies that ex­am­ined the use of dig­it­al tech­nol­ogy in 411,430 adults around the world. The av­er­age age was 69 years old and all had a cog­nit­ive test or diag­nos­is. He said:


"Using digital devices in the way that we use televisions - passive and sedentary, both physically and mentally - is not likely to be beneficial. But our computers and smartphones also can be mentally stimulating, afford social connections, and provide compensation for cognitive abilities that are declining with ageing. These latter types of uses have long been regarded as beneficial for cognitive ageing."

In contrast to the tales of tiredness and other woes often associated with lengthy screen work, I've always - oddly - felt energised by a successful stint at the keyboard. I suspect it's the active engagement, the problem-solving, the profitable following of rules to achieve a desired end. The mind kept nimble by the skills required even at a basic level, like the HTML work needed to present this webpage.

Sam Gilbert, professor of cognitive neuroscience at University College London, said:


"We cannot be sure whether technology usage itself preserves cognitive ability, whether preserved cognitive ability leads to more frequent use of technology, or - most likely - some combination of the two. Nevertheless, this work challenges alarmist ideas about so-called 'digital dementia' and instead suggests that using digital technology can be good for brain health."

I'm happy to hear, for the first time, that my hours at the computer have been doing me good.

Here's the Guardian piece: The Guardian: Older people who use smartphones 'have lower rates of cognitive decline'

Friday 18th April

An age-related post today.

One of the big turn-ons for Trump is to have people crawl to him, "kissing my ass". [An image I'm now trying hard to forget.] Italian PM Meloni was with him yesterday, the latest in a long line of political leaders beating a path to the White House. Few people, other than Anders Vistisen, Danish member of the European Parliament ("Mr Trump, f*** off"), and of course the Chinese government, are bold enough to stand up to the orange bully.

One notable exception is Bernie Sanders, United States sen­at­or from Ver­mont. I've had little sense of coun­ter-Trump pub­lic pro­test since in­aug­ur­at­ion, but Bernie has been pull­ing in huge crowds - 36,000 in Los Ang­el­es last Sat­ur­day - on his "Fight Ol­ig­archy" tour.



Here's the age thing. He's accompanied on the tour by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, progressive Democrat serving as the U.S. representative for New York's 14th congressional district. She's 35. However, a big draw to the rallies has been the musical pairing of Neil Young and Joan Baez.



Neil's 79, Joan is 84, and Bernie himself is 83.

How come these oldies are front and centre of this protest campaign, the poster-boy and -girl faces, rather than thrusting young activists? Of course, they come from a counter-culture tradition, particularly Baez. A big echo for me of the time I spent in the USA in 1970, when we shut down the school I attended in protest after the Kent State killings, and I sat on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial at a Black Panther rally in Washington. Singing along to Country Joe McDonald (and the Fish) and his Vietnam Song - "And it's one, two, three, what are we fighting for?". Although they (Baez & Co) - and we - were dissidents then, and still are, I suppose that we were also the post-WWII generation that believed in the large institutions developed to provide the checks and balances against autocracy and future wars, the UN, ECHR, ICC - all challenged these days by the right ... Trump, Vance, Musk, Badenoch, Farage.

I find it remarkable that these three are still showing up, and being noticed. Having an effect, carrying a voice, far more than many sixty years younger. Recognised, and listened to, by Gen Z?

Alastair Campbell was asked by a listener on The Rest is Politics (TRIP) - Question Time yesterday - "he's a big fan, this one", winked Campbell - whether he thought that he and Stewart represented "old politics", i.e. by being liberal centrists in this age of populism, believers in rule-of-law while Musk takes his chainsaw to treasured institutions.

There has also been discussion on the TRIP podcast of the 27% of young people who would favour dictatorship over democracy, according to the youth poll carried out by Glasgow University's John Smith Centre.

So, I ask, is my left-leaning generation out of touch?

Donald Trump is 78.

Thursday 17th April

On Tuesday I had a small rant at Bezos and his priapic space indulgence as we witness the atrocities of Gaza. Thank-you, Ben Jennings, for giving us this picture:


Tuesday 15th April

Yes, a month without writing, worn down by the shitshow out there. Mostly inflicted by the modern oligarchs: Trump, Musk, Bezos and the rest. It is so hard to stomach their moral bankruptcy and obscene wealth as we witness the sufferings of Ukraine, Gaza, Sudan ... and anywhere else not on their "America First" priority list. Bezos sending a bunch of perma-tanned women into space in a dollar splurge that would alleviate so much suffering on earth. Pointless, self-promoting, vile.

So I'll go for light relief today.

My friend Aidan WhatsApped me this photo yesterday, captioned "The shortest diversion in the history of highway maintenance":



I responded with this, captioned "Shortest cycle lane in Stroud (UK?)":



It's real. I've cycled through it many times on the way to my fav­our­ite but­cher in Stone­house, on the Cainscross Road heading west out of Stroud where the buses stop for all the schools along that stretch.

The wackiest thing about this brief nod to cyclist safety is that it is repeated several times. The highways people were not content with having only one go at it. There are maybe 15 numbered bus stop bays (you can see the indication for "Bay n" at the bottom of the pic) and the markings are in the gaps between bays. Is that useful? Imagine that all the bays are full, like around 3:15pm. What's a cyclist meant to do?

There is one other feature that gets me about this lane. It's the slavish application of what must be the lane marking protocol which demands that you have a bike picture at the beginning and another at the end. A toggle: bike lane on/bike lane off. Really? At 15 miles an hour you're in the lane for a split-second. You surely don't need to be told that it's over. One pic in the middle would do, wouldn't it? But those are the rules for the council lane marker, woe betide he who dares to disobey.

Saturday 15th March


Friday 14th March

I've been mirroring this blog on Instagram for those who more read­ily go there than to a web­site. After I posted yest­er­day's moan about spend­ing too much time on Trump, an Insta­gram user rep­lied with the rec­omm­end­at­ion that I simp­ly stop, pay no fur­ther att­ent­ion. I'm con­sid­er­ing the idea. It's hard, diff­icult for those of us who are fasc­in­ated by what's going on in the world to turn away. And, in my def­ence, Trump is hav­ing a big im­pact on all our lives at the mom­ent, just as his mon­ster ego de­mands. So for to­day at least I'm go­ing risk even more scru­tiny of the blob and his chief crony.

Elon Musk, recently tearful in a Fox News interview, admits to "great difficulty" in managing the Department for Government Efficiency (DOGE) alongside SpaceX, xAI and Tesla. Of course, I don't honestly know how he has felt about the tsunami of criticism and scorn that DOGE has generated, but I suspect he's a little taken aback. He thinks he's doing the right thing: "I'm just here trying to make government more efficient." He encourages us to take an look at what he's doing, openly: "We are actually trying to be as transparent as possible. All of our actions are maximally transparent. I don't know of a case where an organization has been more transparent than the DOGE organization."

So, have you accepted his offer and taken a look at the DOGE web­site (link at bot­tom of post)?

I've included screenshots of my own tour below. Click to enlarge any image, or zoom/pinch/squeeze/what­ever (you will def­in­ite­ly need to for some of the det­ail).

The site opens with "Latest Work", featuring items such as:

Click to enlarge

That's the end of another piece of wokery ;-)

The "Savings" menu gives the big picture. This is really what it's all about according to Musk and Trump. Others may argue that it's an assault on the needy and an intent to shrink the function of the state.

Click to enlarge

This section includes:

Click to enlarge

I don't fully understand the explanation here, but I guess it's an attempt to document with detail different areas of (curbed) expenditure ...

... like wasteful contracts ...

Click to enlarge

... and unnecessary property leases ...

Click to enlarge

So it goes on, with a similar "Payments" sect­ion showing a summ­ary of dis­burse­ments that will be dis­con­tin­ued.

There are also pages intended to describe in broad terms the size and cost of fed­er­al in­vest­ment.

Click to enlarge

Bureaucracy is the number one target. Here's the "Un­const­it­ut­ion­al­ity In­dex": "This is the num­ber of agency rules created by un­elect­ed bur­eau­crats for each law passed by Con­gress in 2024." Here's an ex­plan­at­ion of rules from Har­vard Law School:

"When Congress passes legislation, it often explicitly authorizes federal agencies to implement provisions of the law through rulemaking. While agency rulemaking authority comes from Congress, the president sets priorities for agencies, often through Executive Orders. An incoming administration decides which existing federal rules to target with recission or replacement and directs agencies on what new rulemakings to undertake.


"We expect the Trump administration to attempt to roll back many of the rules promulgated under the Biden administration."

Click to enlarge

In short, DOGE is asserting that the federal government is needlessly and unpatriotically schlerotic.

Right, enough, that's a taste of DOGE.

I wonder if you're thinking the same as I am.

I can't argue against the reduction of bur­eau­cracy, waste and fraud. I grudg­ing­ly have to ad­mire that they've taken on this chall­enge and app­laud the pres­ent­at­ion of res­ults in the public domain.

My two major concerns are approach and motive. Trump and Musk are both scattergun practitioners, they're prepared to shoot before working through all the angles. There is always a risk of collateral damage, often to the least wealthy and fortunate, who after all are not natural Trumpian buddies. You can also detect the wider political agenda in the targets of DOGE scrutiny, the wokerati and coastal elites, crooked Joe Biden's crowd.

Finally, is the website reportage to be trusted? Is it true and acc­ur­ate? Al­though MAGA has been pre­par­ing for years, as ev­id­enced in the Pro­ject 2025 doc­ument, this pres­id­ent­ial term is still very young. The speed of DOGE im­plem­ent­at­ion is blist­er­ing; can DOGE really have instigated such a volume of cases in so short a period? Or is it an­oth­er ach­ieve­ment to app­laud, head firmly over sick bag?

The DOGE website is here: Visit the DOGE website


Thursday 13th March

I worry that I'm in danger of giving Trump what he most craves - att­en­tion. A red-top head­line every day.

I'm also daily becoming more fearful of the "orange bullet", the pros­pect of a Trump­ian fix to two of the most in­tract­able prob­lems of to­day's world. There's a kind of cease­fire in Gaza. Zel­en­sky has ag­reed to at least the US con­cept of a pause with Russia. All since Trump re­claimed the top job. I'm baff­led by how things app­ear to fall for him, if that's how we can be­gin to view those events. How he would crow if we had res­ol­ut­ion, vomit in­duc­ing. [Just so you know, I'm clear­ly not against an end to the strife and loss, only mort­if­ied that the blob should be its arch­it­ect or cat­al­yst.]

From a man who seems to have no proper grasp of how a good rel­at­ion­ship looks. He tells us how well he gets on with despot X, how great is tyrant Y. I can only see these friend­ships as a fig­ment, a puff of self-del­usion.



I really can't say that I understand. Any of it. Are the world leaders who have knelt before the throne in the Oval Office diff­er­ent? I swear I see rab­bit-shock in their eyes. "What's going to hap­pen here? What will he say next? How can I res­pond? Help!"

Wednesday 12th March

Here's a post that unites the personal and the public.

As I've mentioned before in these pages, we attend a vigil for Gaza every Friday evening at 6pm in front of the Stroud Subscription Rooms.



As a spin-off from this we attended a history talk two weeks ago at the Nailsworth Quaker Meeting House titled "From Balfour to Gaza". I took my seat, looked at the speaker, into whom I had also bumped moments before outside the toilets, and thought, "I think I know this man."

Indeed, I did; it became clear when he introduced himself ... my friend Mike Scott-Bau­mann from St. John's Coll­ege, Cam­bridge, last en­count­ered 50-odd years ago. In the in­ter­ven­ing dec­ades Mike has taught hist­ory (for a long per­iod only just down the road at Wyc­liffe in Stone­house; I never knew) and is curr­ent­ly chair of the Exec­ut­ive Comm­ittee of the Bal­four Proj­ect, an org­an­is­at­ion which ack­now­ledges "Brit­ain's hist­or­ic and con­tin­uing res­pons­ib­il­it­ies, we work through ed­uc­at­ion and ad­voc­acy to ad­vance equal rights for Pal­est­in­ians and Israelis". You can visit its web­site here: Visit the Balfour Project website

The History Press, headquartered in Cheltenham, released his book in 2021, since updated:



We met for lunch yesterday and agreed that this pub­lic­at­ion could not have been better timed. I per­son­ally - that's why I was at his talk - have been try­ing hard to und­er­stand more of the back­ground of the pres­ent con­flict. I've read the first few pages of the copy Mike gave me and already feel better equipped.

Broadcaster Jon Snow has commented:

"This book is both necessary and accessible. So many people are myst­if­ied by this never-end­ing Middle East con­flict. Here at last is a con­cise and read­able acc­ount of a fund­a­men­tal in­ter­nat­ion­al issue of our time, one that has im­plic­at­ions far be­yond the reg­ion where it is set."

Tuesday 11th March

Reasons to be cheerful.

Well, at least some humour out of grim times.

I noticed the main story on the front page of the Daily Star on the Waitrose newspaper rack:



Says it all, doesn't it? Really gets to the heart of what drives the orange man-child in the White House. Miffed at Zelensky nipping in for the royal treatment before he gets his state visit. He just wants to feel chosen, ahead of all the rest, actually said the words in a TV interview, an instinctive moan. Now he suspects that Starmer and the King were just pulling his wire.

Then I find out that the lovely Lee Anderson is being tested as Chief Whip of Reform. The Ashfield thug struggles to maintain order among his single-digit band of colleagues.



Finally, Musk has taken a hit since the start of March.



I know, he's still not poor, and this may be a blip. Analysts say it might in part be due to a move from "automotive 'pure play' to diversification into AI and robotics" and suggest that this drop is "creating an attractive entry point for investors". But for the moment, most of us have enjoyed the graph trajectory.

Sunday 9th March

I couldn't let this pass by without a mention, as it's where this blog started nearly five years ago.

Today is (among other things):



The GOV.UK website explains here: About the Day of Reflection

National Covid Memorial Wall, opposite Houses of Parliament, London

I don't have to go far for my memories - because they're all here in these pages. I spent some time earlier running through what I wrote. Very weird - and of course tragic for many - times.

Here's one distressing observation. At certain points I've consigned Donald Trump to history. Now look where we are.

Friday 7th March

I find the news particularly overwhelming at the moment. Perhaps I watch, listen to and read too much of it, al­though I'd be at a loss were I not informed.

One contributing factor is the relentless output of the Orange Buff­oon. In­ev­it­able given his de­sire to be not­iced, to make a head­line every day.

So it was with pleasure and relief that I yest­er­day stumb­led upon an Insta­gram feed of Priv­ate Eye car­toons. I'll share one with you. It made me chuck­le, light­ly. It had noth­ing to do with any of the world's bad guys.



No Trump. No Vance. No Musk. Just funny.

Thursday 6th March

Governance by social media ... and press con­fer­ence, TV sound­bite, photo opp­or­tun­ity. Check out Trump's blast of last night. An ex­plic­it ex­ist­ent­ial threat - "if you don't do as I say" - to the "People of Gaza", direct from the leader of a dis­tant, over­whelm­ing­ly more pow­er­ful country, del­iv­er­ed via his "truth" platform.



This has gone viral. Some doubt about origin and attribution, looks like Banksy, signed Loretto. Valid nonetheless.


Wednesday 5th March

The commentators and columnists are struggling, the podcasters too. When I'm lost for words, I often turn to the cartoonists for help, post a handful of their takes. But there are simply too many after this last week.

I'll restrict myself to a couple.

Megan Herbert of Australia's The Age and Sydney Morning Herald has some handy detail in summary (click to enlarge):



David Sipress of The New Yorker shares the gloom of his pro­fess­ion­al col­leagues and (at least some of) his com­pat­riots:


Sunday 2nd March

The Mail on Sunday condemns Trump? Starmer gets a pat on the back? In the new world order, there's a surprise every day ...


Saturday 1st March

What would you expect from Truth Social?






Friday 28th February

You've probably seen this video, as it was shown on the BBC national news two nights ago (fact-checked by BBC Verify), The Guardian ran a piece yest­er­day, oth­er­wise ... viral ev­ery­where. I'm post­ing it here for the record.

Did Trump really put this out? I searched on Truth Social. Yes, it was there under his profile.

On how many levels is it wrong?



Surely no sane person can think like this. The President of the United States? Apart from anything else, would you really want to display pictures of your podgy self on a sun lounger?

You'd be justified in asking why I have any truck with X and Truth Social; I admit ... I have accounts with both. My defence is that I want to hear without filter from the horses' mouths, however bad their breath. I never post, just observe ... and let my jaw drop.

The outpourings of Trump on his platform stretch be­yond the out­er reach­es of my im­ag­in­at­ion. Over-the-top praise of his cabinet appointees, blunt dismissal of opponents. Copious self-con­grat­ul­at­ion. A del­uge of "wins" in his first month, more than any previous pre­sid­ent, he claims.



Click to enlarge

Of course, our Labour party could do with success stories, and we'd like to hear about them. Starmer's team appears to have none of Trump's knack of doing what he says, picking off low-hanging fruit, choosing targets that resonate with the electorate, and then telling us what he's done.

Thursday 27th February

Everybody's beating a path to Trump, to the Court of the Orange King. I don't envy them. It's a difficult act both to grovel and stand tall.

"I do deals. My whole life is deals. That's all I know, is deals."

If you're trying to get inside Trump's head, understanding the above is clearly one of the keys, particularly as he says it himself. Plus we should heed the old advice: "Follow the money" ... or real estate ... or rare earth. He always needs something in return, hates the idea of anybody getting the better of him, of being ripped off: Europe not paying its way in NATO (as he sees it), Ukraine sucking money out of Uncle Sam. Yet weirdly, and crucially, he only affords respect to those with power enough to take something from him too. Part of the turn-on of a deal is that it is by definition reciprocal. It's a both-way handshake. Big bad boys rubbing up against each other.

I've written in these pages about the "silver bullet" needed to resolve some of the world's intractable problems. In recent days, a shiver has passed through my body as I imagine a variant - the "orange bullet". What if Trump did unlock some world stalemates, do what many previous US presidents have failed to do? It's a primary part of the legacy he would like to build. He has certainly got people's attention and leaders are hopping to impress.

But what a thought. Indigestible.

I've mentioned Orwell in earlier posts. Can you think of a novel more prescient than 1984? The current Trump-Putin mini-entente doesn't quite fit, but the presence of three superpowers holds good. Driven by self-interest. The idea of global co-operation dashed, international institutions and altruism scorned. Subjective truth.


Thursday 6th February


Saturday 1st February

After the shock of Trump's first days as 47th president - four more years of this madness, really? - let me turn to another source of rage, the word that can still not be spoken in UK government quarters. Five years ago yesterday we left.



Gloom, anger and bewilderment have filled these pages on the topic in all that time (and more, nearly a decade), and yes, the damage has been immense, but I'm inclined to be more positive today. Here's what YouGov (sort of a horse's mouth) says:



It's maddening only to be reclaiming ground that we gave up voluntarily (that's right, 5% of GDP), but hey, at least we're heading back in the right direction, and some of the other half are coming to their senses. Starmer still can't say the word, but he clearly knows he has to be closer to Europe, or he can kiss goodbye to growth. How far might he go in another five years? Of course, that's a whole other debate, whether floundering Labour can pull themselves together enough to secure another term.



Here's the link to explore more detail on the YouGov site: YouGov: How do Britons feel about Brexit five years on?

Thursday 29th January

I'm chuffed that cartoonist Guy Venables has echoed my comments about Trump's take on opportunities in Gaza:



In yesterday's The Rest is Politics podcast, Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart debated whether Trump could be called a fascist. Campbell drew our attention to a document, a poster allegedly once sold in the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum shop in Wash­ing­ton DC, based on an article written by Laurence W. Britt in the bimonthly secular humanist journal Free Inquiry Magazine (Vol 22 no 2, 15 July 2003) titled "Fascism Anyone?". Britt had identified 14 common themes in seven regimes he examined: Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Franco's Spain, Salazar's Portugal, Pap­ad­op­oul­os's Greece, Pinochet's Chile and Suharto's Indonesia.



Campbell asked Stewart - and the listener - to match and grade each of these assertions against Trump's MAGA-unleashed USA, where 1 = 'not at all' and 10 = 'completely'.

What do you think? Useful in some, but not all, respects. I get that Campbell was trying to highlight unpleasant and dangerous aspects of Trump's intentions, but I'm not convinced that fascism is the right term, or that the 14 themes properly define fascism. Narcissism would be a more appropriate label for Trump himself, along with all his "art of the deal" trans­act­ion­al approach, the "look out for number one" or "what's in it for me?" instinct (both for Trump personally and the USA as a whole). He's too chaotic and obsessed with self to be defined by any -ism or recognised for any specific political ideology. He does however run counter to and distrusts most of the rule-of-law beliefs and institutions that the USA has developed and supported over many decades, the UN, WHO, ICJ and more, in all their wokeness. What most scares those of us brought up in the liberal tradition is the rejection and dismantling of forces for good, the collaborative stuff of a better world. And, of course, he is quite simply just horrid, creepy and repulsive.

Monday 27th January

Trump profile pictures on X

Yes, like most, I'm reeling from the Trump in­aug­ur­al on­slaught, the MAGA tsu­nami. Four years of getting ready to go on day one of his ret­urn, cel­eb­ra­ted on the White House web­site View Trump 100 hour actions:



From the hours of news bulletin and pod­cast, from yards of print co­ve­rage in the last week, one ob­ser­va­tion that has stood out for me came from Rory Stewart on The Rest is Pol­it­ics. He sug­gested that Trump was aim­ing to build a strong­hold in the Am­er­icas (with the incl­us­ion of the Pan­ama Canal, Can­ada ... and Green­land). Xi Jin­ping can do what he wants in the South China Sea and with Tai­wan, Putin can re-col­on­ise East­ern Europe and rest­ore the Russia of his youth.

A map imagined in 1949 comes to mind:



Although Trump is not advocating the Oc­ean­ia-Eur­asia-East­asia per­pet­ual war (he does­n't like to pay for it), dyst­op­ian days none­the­less. Maga­speak instead of Newspeak, ob­ject­ive truth ban­ished. As long as Trump's home patch is un­aff­ected or ben­ef­its, the post-WWII con­cerns of the rule of law, in­ter­nat­ion­al ag­ree­ments that fos­ter whole-world health and safe­ty (WHO, Paris, NATO) can go hang. The rest of the planet in­ter­ests him only where he can make a dime, strike a deal. He was asked last Mon­day if he thought the Gaza cease­fire would hold and com­ment­ed that beaut­iful things could be done there, it's on the sea, great wea­ther ... you could see him imag­in­ing the dev­el­op­ment of Trump hotels and golf courses, after he's moved every­body out to Egypt and Jordan.

Today is Holocaust Memorial Day. How app­ro­priate of in­aug­ur­al bud­dy Elon Musk to tweet this res­ponse to acc­us­at­ions of a fasc­ist sal­ute:



On Saturday Musk made a surprise video appear­ance at Ger­many's far-right Alt­er­nat­ive für Deutsch­land (AfD) el­ect­ion cam­paign rally.

Friday 24th January


Monday 20th January


Thursday 2nd January

I said on Tuesday that I no longer need to make those hard­core res­ol­ut­ions, as al­co­hol and to­bacco are things of the past. I can dream a bit more, light­ly, acc­ent­uate the positive. Here's a sample of my non-ex­haus­tive, un­ord­ered list:
  • Contact a friend ('phone, message, email, send a postcard ...) every day.
  • Invite acquaintances, like people I know by sight in the street, to join me for a cup of tea and a conversation, with the intention of getting to know them better.
  • Have lunch with my sister at least every other month.
  • Plan long weekend breaks to European cities I have not yet visited.
  • Visit my cousins.
  • Go up to Minchinhampton Common regularly to hack a golf ball around and witness the big skies.
  • Organise day trips to interesting places within striking distance.
  • Cook something new every week.
  • Walk in a Gloucestershire beauty spot once a week.
  • Build and maintain my own events diary (aggregated from local media, newsletters and websites) for Stroud.
My hope is that if I do some of these I'll be encouraged to tack­le the mun­dane crap that I must also add­ress, the things I'm prone to avoid.

Others may have different plans (click to enlarge):

Click to enlarge

That's the tricky part, isn't it? We have to put up with all of those above.

Wednesday 1st January



© Charlie Lewis 2025
Email: charlie_c_lewis@hotmail.com